The higher the dose of ivermectin the better it works

[LetItGo]

"So clotting is a huge problem with this spike protein. Interferon. So interferon is a very important chemical that your cells make to recruit cells to react to either infections or cancer. Interferon is suppressed by the spike protein — so that's another harm of the spike protein. So there are medicines that can re-rev up your interferon — some of them are the drugs that shall not be named."

Dr. Cole can’t help but laugh at the corrupt state of medicine.

He continued. "Interestingly, too. I mean, ivermectin. But ivermectin also binds one of the clotting receptors, the CD147 receptor. So some of these miracle rebound patients that many colleagues have seen around the world that were in the ICU and given up for dead — given high doses of ivermectin.

[Gunslinger201]

I can't help but remember the "Assclowns" here who called it "Sheep Dip....once again proving a single digit IQ



The FDA did this to protect the Pharma groups bribing them...and they STILL vote Democrat

[KarmaVarmint]

I can't help but remember the "Assclowns" here who called it "Sheep Dip....once again proving a single digit IQ

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.tF5gnE2xJ ... mgDet&rs=1

The FDA did this to protect the Pharma groups bribing them...and they STILL vote Democrat

lol.

"Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19"

In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world's most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

[oflguy]

Think about all the people who died because liberals denied medication that could have saved their lives. Liberals have blood on their hands.

My niece is one of the ones that died because her doctor refused to give her life-saving medication when she got corona virus.

When my son, a doctor, tried to talk to her "doctor" before she died to ask her why she was refusing medication to my niece, the doctor refused to talk to him.

Needless to say, this is a sensitive issue with me.

When I got it, I had to browbeat the doctor, then imply I would sue him before he would prescribe anything. He told me he would only prescribe medication if I had difficulty breathing and had to be admitted to the hospital.

At one point, I asked him if he was a democrat or a republican. He said it didn't make any difference. I told him yes it does, because democrats kill people with Covid.

[def_con5]

Wow, it's still super political. I can't find a simple history of when it was FDA approve. But it is,
Once approved it's legal to use a drug to treat other diseases. It's called an off label use, and over 30% of drugs are used off label.
Why the left started such a crusade to pretend Ivermectin was an animal drug is beyond my ability to understand.
It truly is none of their business for them to decide what your doctor prescribes.

• [

quote=Gunslinger201 post_id=427944 time=1695321733 user_id=56]
I can't help but remember the "Assclowns" here who called it "Sheep Dip....once again proving a single digit IQ



The FDA did this to protect the Pharma groups bribing them...and they STILL vote Democrat
[/quote]

[Nero]

"Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19"
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Susanna Naggie, MD, MHS1,2; David R. Boulware, MD, MPH3; Christopher J. Lindsell, PhD4; et al

Key Points
Question Does ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo, shorten symptom duration among adult (≥30 years) outpatients with symptomatic mild to moderate COVID-19?

Findings In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial including 1206 US adults with COVID-19 during February 2022 to July 2022, the median time to sustained recovery was 11 days in the ivermectin group and 11 days in the placebo group. In this largely vaccinated (84%) population, the posterior probability that ivermectin reduced symptom duration by more than 1 day was less than 0.1%.

Meaning These findings do not support the use of ivermectin among outpatients with COVID-19.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2801827

[Mouth Of Chaos]

"Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19"
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Susanna Naggie, MD, MHS1,2; David R. Boulware, MD, MPH3; Christopher J. Lindsell, PhD4; et al

Key Points
Question Does ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo, shorten symptom duration among adult (≥30 years) outpatients with symptomatic mild to moderate COVID-19?

Findings In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial including 1206 US adults with COVID-19 during February 2022 to July 2022, the median time to sustained recovery was 11 days in the ivermectin group and 11 days in the placebo group. In this largely vaccinated (84%) population, the posterior probability that ivermectin reduced symptom duration by more than 1 day was less than 0.1%.

Meaning These findings do not support the use of ivermectin among outpatients with COVID-19.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2801827

YAFB

[def_con5]

Maybe you would be kind enough to explain why Ivermectin not working is so important to your side. If a doc wants to prescribe it, why did you all constantly interfere?
Trump did not endorse Ivermectin, he endorsed Hydroxychloroquine.

"Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19"
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Susanna Naggie, MD, MHS1,2; David R. Boulware, MD, MPH3; Christopher J. Lindsell, PhD4; et al

Key Points
Question Does ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo, shorten symptom duration among adult (≥30 years) outpatients with symptomatic mild to moderate COVID-19?

Findings In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial including 1206 US adults with COVID-19 during February 2022 to July 2022, the median time to sustained recovery was 11 days in the ivermectin group and 11 days in the placebo group. In this largely vaccinated (84%) population, the posterior probability that ivermectin reduced symptom duration by more than 1 day was less than 0.1%.

Meaning These findings do not support the use of ivermectin among outpatients with COVID-19.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2801827

[KarmaVarmint]

"Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19"
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Susanna Naggie, MD, MHS1,2; David R. Boulware, MD, MPH3; Christopher J. Lindsell, PhD4; et al

Key Points
Question Does ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo, shorten symptom duration among adult (≥30 years) outpatients with symptomatic mild to moderate COVID-19?

Findings In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial including 1206 US adults with COVID-19 during February 2022 to July 2022, the median time to sustained recovery was 11 days in the ivermectin group and 11 days in the placebo group. In this largely vaccinated (84%) population, the posterior probability that ivermectin reduced symptom duration by more than 1 day was less than 0.1%.

Meaning These findings do not support the use of ivermectin among outpatients with COVID-19.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2801827

Two problems with the study:

|A total of 1206 participants older than 30 years with confirmed COVID-19 experiencing at least 2 symptoms of acute infection for less than or equal to 7 days were enrolled at 93 sites in the US from February 16, 2022, through July 22, 2022, with follow-up data through November 10, 2022."

"Conclusions and Relevance Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo did not improve time to sustained recovery. These findings do not support the use of ivermectin in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19."

It's known that Ivermectin must be applied immediately upon experiencing symptome. Not 7 days later when the course of the infection in nearly complete in many patients. And, "mild to moderate" is sketchy as fuck. "The protocol defined “mild to moderate” as having symptoms as noted above self-reported at the time of enrollment, and symptoms were graded by participants as none, mild, moderate, or severe."

What a pantload.

[lextalionis]

Maybe you would be kind enough to explain why Ivermectin not working is so important to your side. If a doc wants to prescribe it, why did you all constantly interfere?
Trump did not endorse Ivermectin, he endorsed Hydroxychloroquine.

I was treated with hydroxychloroquine. It knocked out the virus in 4 days. Then just 3 months later it was declared a poison by the idiot leftist media. I wonder how many it could have saved.

[lextalionis]

Maybe you would be kind enough to explain why Ivermectin not working is so important to your side. If a doc wants to prescribe it, why did you all constantly interfere?
Trump did not endorse Ivermectin, he endorsed Hydroxychloroquine.

Because they were told to by their cult leaders. Also, it was very important to force the "vaccine" on the population.

[Nero]

Maybe you would be kind enough to explain why Ivermectin not working is so important to your side. If a doc wants to prescribe it, why did you all constantly interfere?
Trump did not endorse Ivermectin, he endorsed Hydroxychloroquine.

Its not about "sides." Tens of millions of conservatives got vaccinated with the "Trumpcine." It has always been about preventing injury and death plus using drugs that actually work.
"Poison Control Centers Are Fielding A Surge Of Ivermectin Overdose Calls"
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronaviru ... ol-centers

"Toxic Effects from Ivermectin Use Associated with Prevention and Treatment of Covid-19"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2114907

[Nero]

"Study Finds No Benefit to Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19 Symptoms"
Ivermectin is one of three repurposed medications currently being tested in ACTIV-6, a nationwide double-blind study.
https://corporate.dukehealth.org/news/s ... 9-symptoms

[LetItGo]

Wow, it's still super political. I can't find a simple history of when it was FDA approve. But it is,
Once approved it's legal to use a drug to treat other diseases. It's called an off label use, and over 30% of drugs are used off label.
Why the left started such a crusade to pretend Ivermectin was an animal drug is beyond my ability to understand.
It truly is none of their business for them to decide what your doctor prescribes.

• [

quote=Gunslinger201 post_id=427944 time=1695321733 user_id=56]
I can't help but remember the "Assclowns" here who called it "Sheep Dip....once again proving a single digit IQ



The FDA did this to protect the Pharma groups bribing them...and they STILL vote Democrat

[/quote]

Looks like they’re pairing ivermectin with another anti-parasitic to FIGHT CANCER.

Just imagine if we had blanketed the populace with ivermectin and we saw cancers cured. Holy cows.

[KarmaVarmint]

"Study Finds No Benefit to Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19 Symptoms"
Ivermectin is one of three repurposed medications currently being tested in ACTIV-6, a nationwide double-blind study.
https://corporate.dukehealth.org/news/s ... 9-symptoms

More junk science. It's sick how many layers of corruption they've pasted on to this faux science.

ACTIV-6 is part of the National Institutes of Health-funded Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) and is led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The DCRI serves as the study’s clinical coordinating center, partnering with Vanderbilt University Medical Center as the study’s data coordinating center.

The study is leveraging the infrastructure of PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Trial Innovation Network, a collaborative initiative within the NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program that helps address critical roadblocks in clinical trials and accelerate the translation of novel interventions into life-saving therapies.