There are studies being done all over the planet. For the sake of brevity, this was just one.KarmaVarmint wrote: ↑September 21st, 2023, 6:27 pm More junk science. It's sick how many layers of corruption they've pasted on to this faux science.
ACTIV-6 is part of the National Institutes of Health-funded Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) and is led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The DCRI serves as the study’s clinical coordinating center, partnering with Vanderbilt University Medical Center as the study’s data coordinating center.
The study is leveraging the infrastructure of PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Trial Innovation Network, a collaborative initiative within the NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program that helps address critical roadblocks in clinical trials and accelerate the translation of novel interventions into life-saving therapies.
There is no country on this planet that has recommended Ivermectin over COVID-19 vaccines.
From England:
"Ivermectin for COVID-19 review update: 11 trials and no evidence of benefit shown"
There remains no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection, state the authors of an updated Cochrane Review(link is external)(opens in a new tab), which now contains 11 trials across 3409 people. The authors note that evidence is limited, and evaluation of ivermectin is continuing in ongoing studies.
https://www.lstmed.ac.uk/news-events/ne ... efit-shown